Legal Opinion
Hutchins v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1938No. 8709PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, a citizen of Texas, filed a stockholder’s bill in equity against the ap-pellee insurance companies, both of which are California corporations, and their directors. Samuel L. Carpenter, Jr., dnsur-auce commissioner of the State of California, was also named as a defendant.
On motion of appellees the trial court ordered a dismissal. Appellant thereupon moved for leave to amend, attaching to her motion a proposed amended bill. Leave was denied and a formal order of dismissal entered on the ground of the “failure of said bill to state facts warranting this court to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mach-Tronics, Inc. v. ZirpoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Moody v. State Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Gillis v. Keystone Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Butler v. JUDGE OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Kirk v. SiquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.