Legal Opinion
United States v. Marion
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 26, 2009No. 08-13884PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal by the United States government involves interpretation of the criminal forfeiture provisions in 21 U.S.C. § 853 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2. At issue is the timeliness of Patricia Gray’s third-party petition asserting a claim in properties subject to forfeiture. The government contends that Gray’s petition was untimely because it was not filed within thirty days of her receiving notice of the preliminary order of forfeiture. The district court disagreed on grounds that the petition was filed within thirty days from the date that criminal judgment was entered…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arthur v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Robert PetrieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Gowan v. Patriot Group, LLC (In Re Dreier LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Antonio FariasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. A. Erpenbeck, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. ConeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.