Hendricks v. Daniels
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from ninth district court. ", Action by Samuel E. Hendricks, as assignee of Carl R'andrup, against George S. Daniels, to recover $100 as commission for procuring a purchaser for certain property belonging to defendant. From a judgment entered on a verdict for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.
Defendant employed plaintiff’s assignor, Bandrup, a real-estate broker, early in April, 1890, to sell his two houses for $4,250 each. Bandrup offered one of them on July 25th to one Boland, who proposed to take it providing he could get possession at a date named, and upon certain terms and conditions as to payment, and who reserved his decision until the next day, promising to notify Bandrup then whether he would take the house, and, if he decided to take it, agreeing to meet Bandrup on the Monday following to go to defendant’s office and close the transaction. Bandrup immediately notified…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ames v. McNallyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Atwater v. WilsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Goodman v. Tailored Silk Undergarment Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1928