Legal Opinion

Burdell v. Comstock

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 5, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBaxter, J.

The proper forum in which to sue for damages arising from an infringement of a patent is a court of law. Root v. Railway Co. 105 U. S. 189. But chancery courts may take cognizance of such cases if they involve some element of equitable jurisdiction. *396Owners of patents are entitled, as well to protection against future invasions of their rights, as to compensation for past injuries. Hence, parties desiring such relief must, from the necessities of their cases, invoke the aid of courts authorized to issue injunctions, and when jurisdiction is once rightfully obtained, the court may proceed and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Thompson v. Railroad CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waite v. O'NeilU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1896
  2. United Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Winston Cigarette Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
  3. Potter v. WhitneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API