Legal Opinion

Chicago & E. R. Co. v. Shaw

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 6, 1902No. 793PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error was the defendant below in an action by the defendant in error (plaintiff below) to recover for personal injuries received in the switch yards of -the plaintiff in error. The substantial facts in the case may be stated as follows: The plaintiff in error, the Chicago & Erie Railroad Company, owns and operates a railroad from the city of Chicago to points east, and maintains, in the vicinity of Fifty-First street, switch yards, consisting of a number of tracks, running north and south, and parallel with each other. The north end of four of these tracks, numbered 15, 16,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carner v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Lovell v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Butler v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API