Clinton Hobbs and Wanda Hobbs v. Mobile County.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WISE, Justice.
Clinton Hobbs and Wanda Hobbs appeal from a judgment of the Mobile Circuit Court, granting a motion to dismiss in favor of defendant Mobile County (“the County”)- We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
The Hobbses filed a complaint against the County, Thompson Engineering, Inc., and Hosea 0. Weaver & Sons, Inc. (“the defendants”). They alleged the following facts in their complaint:
“In June 2001, [the Hobbses] purchased that certain real property generally described _at Celeste Court, Sara-land, Alabama. Subsequent to the purchase of their…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Rice v. United Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Raley v. Citibanc of Alabama/AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Winther v. United States Steel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025