Legal Opinion

City of Hot Springs v. Carter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 21, 1992No. 92-217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr.,

Chief Justice. This case involves the constitutionality of a municipal sign ordinance.

The appellant, the City of Hot Springs (City), passed Ordinance No. 3987, subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 4035, establishing comprehensive guidelines for the regulation of signs within the City’s limits. Ordinance No. 3987, as amended, provides in pertinent part as follows:

III. DEFINITIONS

Portable temporary attraction sign: A single or double surface, internally illuminated, painted or poster panel type sign or some variation thereof, which is temporary in nature, usually mounted on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Streight v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Arkansas Hospital Ass'n v. Arkansas State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, FAYETTEVILLE v. Osage Oil & Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Donrey Communications Co. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Gravett v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API