Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 23, 2002No. Case 01-2015-JWLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This duty to defend and indemnify action arises out of an insurance coverage dispute over faulty workmanship on a project to construct a performing arts center and middle school (the “project”) in La-Cyne, Kansas. After a bench trial, the court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 26, 2002. In that Memorandum and Order, the court awarded plaintiff Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (“F & D”) $1,000,000 for damages incurred as a result of property damages to the project and $680,818.13 for attorneys’ fees and expenses…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Royal College Shop, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, and Thomas H. Black, Cross-Appellees v. Northern Insurance Co. Of N.Y., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Blair Construction, Inc. v. McBethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Ireland v. DodsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Moffit v. ValueHealth, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025