Nichols v. Howe
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Steuben Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
The board of commissioners of Steuben county had been sued in the Circuit Court, and Mr. Howe had appeared as attorney for them. It is conceded that he had not been employed at any regular session of the board of commissioners. It is also conceded that the prosecuting attorney was present, and competent to defend the interests of the county. The bill of exceptions says, “these were all the facts found in the case.”
It elsewhere appears in the record that Howe filed with the commissioners an account as follows, viz.:
Steuben county to John B. Howe, Dr. To services as counsel in Milnes v. The…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Waymire v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Hoffman v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Miller v. EmbreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Board of Commissioners v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Fordyce v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.