People ex rel. Thomson v. Board of Supervisors
New York Supreme Court
APPLICATIONS for writs of mandamus. The facts upon which the applications were made are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
The first of these cases was an application for a mandamus to compel the board of supervisors to apportion to the several towns and wards of the county, the aggregate amount of county charges that have been audited by them at their present session, according to the valuation *409of real and personal estate in the several towns and wards, as apportioned and equalized by them, in pursuance of a resolution of said board, passed and entered in their book of minutes, by their clerk, on the 10th day of December, 1861, a copy of which resolution appeared in the papers.
The motion was opposed on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weaver v. DevendorfNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Supervisors of Onondaga v. BriggsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- McCullough v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Supervisors of Chenango v. BirdsallNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- People ex rel. M'Kinch v. Directors of Bristol & Rensselaerville Turnpike RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1840
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Osterhoudt v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People Ex Rel. McCabe v. . MatthiesNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- People Ex Rel. Hotchkiss v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- People v. StockingNew York Supreme Court · 1866
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.