Trowbridge v. Dominy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, J.(a) As to ground 1 (a) of the motion to dismiss, it is true that no right of appeal lies from a municipal court to the Department of Public Safety. However, in determining what the “writing” of the plaintiff in error constitutes, .it is proper and necessary to construe the pleading in accordance with its allegations and prayers. The pleader is not bound by •the name by which he denominates his pleading, as “there is no magic in mere nomenclature.” Girtman v. Girtman, 191 Ga. 173, 180 (11 S. E. 2d 782). The plaintiff in error is not bound, therefore, by reason of having designated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Girtman v. GirtmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Pearson v. WimbishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Jenkins v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Mayo v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Hart v. MansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cole v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Shirley v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- City of Albany v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Armstrong v. LambCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Cole v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.