Pogrebnoy v. Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Oleg Pogrebnoy sued Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc.; MMAP, Inc.; Vitaly Matusov; and Alexander Ginzburg (collectively, “Matusov”) for trademark and trade dress inMngement. After a three-day bench trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of the defendants. Pogreb-noy appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The district court erred by applying the Tea Rose-Rectanus doctrine to bar Po-grebnoy’s trademark infringement claim. The Tea Rose-Rectanus doctrine does not apply where the junior user had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Fortune Dynamic, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Lahoti v. VeriCheck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.