Legal Opinion

Pogrebnoy v. Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2017No. 15-55127Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Oleg Pogrebnoy sued Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc.; MMAP, Inc.; Vitaly Matusov; and Alexander Ginzburg (collectively, “Matusov”) for trademark and trade dress inMngement. After a three-day bench trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of the defendants. Pogreb-noy appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The district court erred by applying the Tea Rose-Rectanus doctrine to bar Po-grebnoy’s trademark infringement claim. The Tea Rose-Rectanus doctrine does not apply where the junior user had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Fortune Dynamic, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Lahoti v. VeriCheck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API