Legal Opinion

Reichley v. North Penn School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1993No. 180 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County holding that the Public Employee Relations Act (PERA), Act of July 23, 1970, P.L. 563, No. 195, 43 P.S. § 1101.101 et seq., is unconstitutional insofar as it *522allows strikes by public educators. Our jurisdiction derives from 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(7).

This matter arose in 1986, when negotiation and mediation failed to produce a new collective bargaining agreement between the North Penn School District and the North Penn Education Association. As permitted by Section 1003 of PERA, 43…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teachers' Tenure Act CasesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Gulnac v. South Butler County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Spa Athletic ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Colonial Gardens Nursing Home, Inc. v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Reichley v. North Penn School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zauflik, A., Aplt. v. Pennsbury School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'n v. Commonwealth Ass'n of School AdministratorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Reichley by Wall v. NORTH PENN SCH. D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Carroll v. Ringgold Education Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API