Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. . the Northern Light Oil Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial district, reversing the judgment rendered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff. This action was brought to recover back from the North-era.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial district, reversing the judgment rendered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff. This action was brought to recover back from the North-era. Light Oil Company the sum of $1,000, which the plaintiff alleged he had paid to the company on a subscription by him, for one hundred shares of its capital stock, on the ground that such subscription had been procured by false and fraudulent representations made by the company, and that the plaintiff had, upon the discovery by him of the fraud, rescinded the…

1Opinion of the CourtGrover, J.

The court erred in refusing to charge the jury as requested by defendant’s counsel, that the plaintiff could not recover, if the jury believed that Mr. Avis, in employing Mr. Lockwood to dispose of stock in the company, or to procure subscriptions therefor, was acting, not as the agent of the company, but for the purpose of disposing of stock in the company which he, Mr. Avis, had agreed to take, at or about the time of the formation of the company. Upon this question the testimony was conflicting. There was no question but that Lockwood, who procured the subscription of the plaintiff for…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. RobbinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  2. Williams v. Western Union Telegraph Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API