Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 8, 1997, which ruled that claimant’s application for a hearing was untimely.

Claimant received respondent’s notice of determination, dated and mailed October 3, 1996, informing her of her ineligibility to receive additional benefits under Labor Law § 599. Although she spoke to the local office on a number of occasions by telephone in response to the notice, claimant did not request a review hearing before an Administrative Law Judge until March 3, 1997, over four months beyond the 30-day limitations period within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AscenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re the Claim of GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re the Claim of Rounds.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of ConnorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of FruscellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re the Claim of MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. In re the Claim of NadafAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API