Legal Opinion

Marc Wakefiled Dunham v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided July 10, 2018No. 14-17-00098-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 10, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00098-CR MARC WAKEFIELD DUNHAM, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 6 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2109329 OPINION A jury convicted appellant Marc Wakefield Dunham of a deceptive business practice. See Tex. Penal Code § 32.42. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement in jail for one year, plus a $4,000 fine. In two issues, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction and that the jury charge…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Vernon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. OWL Assetco I v. EOG ResourcesTexas Business Court · 2025
  2. Dunham, Marc WakefieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023
  3. Dunham, Marc WakefieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023
  4. OWL Assetco I v. EOG ResourcesTexas Business Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API