Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robak v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1984Published

1DissentCasey, J.

Casey, J. (dissenting).

Concededly, since December, 1971 and in each year thereafter, petitioner worked at least 26 weeks in legislative employment that qualified him as an “annual employee” under section 80-a (subd a, par 2) of the Retirement and Social Security Law. However, because he so qualified, he was not ipso facto entitled to the retirement benefits of the section 80-a plan. Since the majority’s holding is based principally on this premise, I respectfully dissent. 11 In my opinion, petitioner was required to comply with the other provisions of that statute as well, and the fact is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Nutt v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Byer v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API