Legal Opinion

Watrous v. Hilliard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1906No. 5208; No. 2819 C. APublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe Comity. Hon. P. L. Palmer, Judge. Action by J. J. Watrous against B. O. Hilliard, receiver, John H. Richards, L. M. Kimball and E. W. Wilson, for an order of distribution in a receivership proceeding. From the judgment, petitioner appeals, and Richards brings cross-error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Late in the afternoon of the 20th day of September, 1899, appellee1, John H. Richards, demanded of The Revenue Mining, Milling and Tunnel Company a settlement on account of his claim for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been theretofore received by him. Upon the following day, one L. M. Kimball, a director of the corporation, filed in the district court of Arapahoe county his complaint, alleging that the corporation was indebted to him in the *258sum of $12,000.00; that the corporation w'as insolvent, and praying the appointment of a receiver. In the filing of this complaint, E. W.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Requa v. ReaNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Brown v. FrostNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Jones v. Bank of LeadvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Cazet v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Adams v. M'MillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blaine County National Bank v. TimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Norman, Inc. v. HolmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  3. Mullen v. BromleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Mullen v. BromleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API