Kluck v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Defendant Kluck raises two issues on this review: (1) Was the evidence secured at the apartment obtained as the result of an illegal search and seizure in violation of plaintiff in error’s (defendant’s) constitutional rights and therefore inadmissible; (2) was there sufficient credible evidence to sustain defendant’s conviction ?
Legality of Search and Seizure.
The trial court held that defendant did not have standing to raise the issue of search and seizure with respect to Cosgrove’s apartment and that the search and seizure were proper. Defendant contends that he has standing and that the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Laasch v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DombrowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Leroux v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HerringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Molina v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.