In re the Estate of Marko
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Samuel J. Silverman, S.
This is a motion to vacate an order for substituted service in a discovery proceeding under SCPA 2103. The ground of the motion is that substituted service is not available in a discovery proceeding and that the method stated in SCPA 2103 (subd. 5) is exclusive.
SCPA 2103 (subd. 5) provides: “ Service of any order herein provided must be made by delivery of a certified copy thereof to the person or persons therein named and the payment or tender to each of the sum required to be paid to a witness as a subpoena fee.”
On the literal reading of the statute, movant has a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gumperz v. HofmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Gumperz v. HofmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lamb v. VergoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Estate of MirskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1989
- Wagner v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of PollinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020