Legal Opinion

Werme's Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 19, 2003No. 2002-719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

On October 17, 2002, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (PCC) found that the respondent, Paula J. Werme, violated New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct 1.2(d) and 8.4(a), and issued a reprimand. Werme appealed. We affirm.

The following facts are relevant to this case. In 1998, Werme represented a mother in a case involving allegations of child abuse by the New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and Families. She appealed the case to Superior Court (Smukler, J.). The mother, acting at the direction of Werme, disclosed information concerning the hearing to the Concord…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Radkay v. ConfaloneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. Chronicle & Gazette Publishing Co. v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  5. In re Brianna B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. NEW HAMPSHIRE ASS'N OF COUNTIES v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Hickson, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API