Ramsey v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Smart-alecks sometimes smirkingly say "Rehearing motions are a waste; judges don’t even read them.” Successful appellate advocates contradict such assertion. The instant appeal is confirmation that rehearing motions are considered closely and in detail because judges recognize they are subject to the affliction called "judicial astigmatism,” which may be both visual *870and mental.
In this case we rendered our original opinion affirming the trial court’s grant to defendant of a summary judgment. This decision was based upon the allegation in the complaint that defendant "acted in bad…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Brown v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Mathis v. R. H. Smallings & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Smith v. Sandersville Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Ramsey v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Varble v. CarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.