Legal Opinion

State Automobile Insurance v. Kuhfahl

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1987No. 2218PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This declaratory judgment comes to us on appeal by the plaintiff, State Automobile Insurance Association (State Auto) from the lower court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and the question to be resolved is whether or not a certain accident comes within the terms of an automobile insurance policy which the appellees, the Kuh-fahls had with State Auto at the time of the accident. State Auto sought a determination by the trial court that the facts and circumstances of the underlying incident infra, are such that the Kuhfahls, the insureds, are not entitled to a legal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance v. Goodville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. D'Auria v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Keystone Automated Equipment Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Heffernan & Co. v. Hartford Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Humphreys v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. American Nuclear Insurers v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Forum Insurance Co. v. Allied Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API