Legal Opinion

John Deere Co. v. Boelus State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1989No. 88-083PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is a suit by the plaintiff, John Deere Company, against the Boelus State Bank on a cashier’s check issued by the defendant bank and payable to the plaintiff. The trial court found that the plaintiff was a holder in due course and entitled to recover $8,455.85. The defendant has appealed and contends that the trial court erred in finding for the plaintiff because there was evidence of an affirmative defense under Neb. U.C.C. § 3-305(2) (Reissue 1980), and in finding that the plaintiff was a holder in due course because the instrument in question was never “issued” within the meaning of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tpo Incorporated v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Eatontown National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Schranz v. I. L. Grossman, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Newman Grove Creamery Co. v. DeaverNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bank of Valley v. MattsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Blaha GMC-Jeep, Inc. v. FrerichsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ashland State Bank v. Elkhorn Racquetball, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hecker v. Ravenna BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stringfellow v. First American National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Transcontinental Holding Ltd. v. First Banks, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Lewis v. OpsteinNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API