Legal Opinion

Chipman v. Manufacturers' National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 29, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The plaintiffs are assignees in insolvency of Dudley Hall & Co. The principal defendant, a national bank doing business in Boston, is a creditor of Dudley Hall & Co. Hall & Co. were adjudged insolvent on March 23, 1891. The assignment to the plaintiffs was made on April 9, 1891. On March 10, 1891, the defendant attached teas in New York in an action there, and it also attached .land in Maine in an action *148there. The teas and the land afterwards were attached by creditors foreign to Massachusetts, upon claims more than sufficient to exhaust the property, so that no part of it or its proceeds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crapo v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Mechanics' Savings Bank v. WaiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hulburd v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Emery v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Haskell v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Deschenes v. TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Batcheller v. National Bank of the RepublicMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API