Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Bolster

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 31, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00097Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MONROE E. BULLOCK, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:19CV97 M. BOLSTER, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Monroe E. Bullock, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this

28 U.S.C. § 2241

Petition. (ECF No. 1.) On January 16, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation finding that Bullock’s two claims should be dismissed without prejudice because Bullock had moved to voluntarily withdraw one, and the Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the other. (ECF No. 12, at 3, 6.) Bullock was advised that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional CorporalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. Hutchinson v. StatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Pack v. YusuffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API