Legal Opinion
Per Aarsleff A/S v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 5, 2015No. 15-215C, 15-272C, and 15-330CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Consolidated post-award bid protests; limitation on competition due to international agreement; 10 U.S.C. § 2304(c); FAR § 6.302.4; inapplicability of bar on jurisdiction over actions based on treaty; 28 U.S.C. § 1502; mistake in a critical eligibility criterion; latent defect discovered by procuring agency prior to award but not corrected; considerations affecting equitable relief
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
In this tripartite bid protest, plaintiffs Per Aarsleff A/S (“Per Aarsleff’), Greenland Contractors I/S (“Greenland Contractors”), and Copenhagen Arctic A/S (“Copenhagen Arctic”)…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Per Aarsleff A/S v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Springfield Parcel C, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Greenland Contractors I/S v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Munilla Construction Management, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.