Legal Opinion
Burka v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 31, 1990No. 85 Civ. 5751 (RPP), 86 Civ. 6536 (RPP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendants move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(b), for an amendment to the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the Opinion and Order of June 5, 1990 (“the Opinion”) in the above captioned cases. 739 F.Supp. 814. This motion pertains to the portion of the Opinion which found that defendants had violated the due process rights of permanent employees of the Transit Authority (TA) who were disciplined because their urine sample, taken between January 1, 1984 and October 1, 1986, tested positive for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Danese v. KnoxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Michael Romano v. Ivan CanutesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Ware v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2001
- Allen v. SchiffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012