Legal Opinion

Arline v. Cornejo

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 28, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00284Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH D. ARLINE, JR., Case No.: 22cv284-DMS(LR) 12 CDCR #T-13192 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SPOLIATION 14 v. SANCTIONS 15 I. CORNEJO, et al., [ECF No. 42] 16 Defendants. 17 18 On September 25, 2023, Plaintiff Keith D. Arline, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), an incarcerated 19 person proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed a 20 “Motion Requesting Sanctions for Defendants[’] Spoliation of Evidence” regarding video 21 and document evidence that Plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Kitsap Physicians ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Glover v. Bic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Bull v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API