Snyder v. Slatton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Greene Circuit Court; Frank Smith, Judge; Defendant was entitled to a judgment non obstante veredicto. 6 Ark. 264; Id. 443; 17 Ark. 71; 19 Ark. 194. Where there are more issues than one, and a verdict on only one, there can be no final judgment, but a venire facias de novo will be awarded. 9 Ark. 62; 4 Ark. 526; 5 Ark. 193; 18 Ark. 248. If these motions fail, then the remedy is reached by motion for a new trial. 119 Ind. 273; 21 N. E. 735; 4 D- R- A. 549.
1Opinion of the CourtFrauenthal, J.
The plaintiff below, D. W. Slat-ton, instituted this suit against the defendant, Wm. Snyder, to recover for the service of a stallion, and to enforce a lien upon the mare, which was then in possession of the defendant J. P. Stepp; alleging that she had been traded since the service. The contract of service provided that a colt was insured, and that the debt was due when the fact was ascertained that the mare was in foal or the mare traded. The right to recover and to the lien was denied upon the ground that the -mare was not with foal, and that she had not been traded; that the mare had only…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Butler v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- McRea v. MerrifieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Sunny South Lumber Co. v. Neimeyer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Dedman v. EarleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Nattin v. RileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thornton v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Clinton v. RossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Webb v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928