Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Ballentine

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 13, 1983No. 82 C 4460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Samuel Coleman (“Coleman”) has sued the Village of Robbins (“Robbins”), three Robbins officials and Cook County Deputy Sheriff A1 Fiorenzo (“Fiorenzo”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”).1 Coleman alleges various violations of his constitutional rights in connection with his termination as a Robbins Special Investigator. Robbins and its three officials (solely for convenience termed “defendants,” even though Fiorenzo has not joined in the motion) have moved to dismiss. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Russell M. Smith v. John J. Cremins, Jr., John F. Mahon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Samuel Coleman, Cross-Appellant v. Marion Smith and Gordon Frierson, Cross-Appellees, and Village of RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Coleman v. FriersonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. Samuel Coleman, Cross-Appellant v. Marion Smith and Gordon Frierson, Cross-Appellees, and Village of RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API