Legal Opinion

Matter of Inquiry Concerning Eads

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1985No. 84-1099PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

This proceeding involves charges of violations of canons of judicial ethics by a district judge. See Iowa Const, art. V, § 19; Iowa Code §§ 605.26-.32 (1983); In re Matter of Harned, 357 N.W.2d 300 (Iowa 1984); In the Matter of Carstensen, 316 N.W.2d 889 (Iowa 1982). We examine the record de novo as in an equity appeal. Carstensen, at 891.

The determinative issues are largely factual, requiring us to relate the testimony quite extensively. The testimony discloses facts which are remarkably undisputed. We begin with the testimony which establishes beyond question that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Matter of CarstensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Matter of HarnedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Kester v. BrunsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. WollenzienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. VealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. In Re O'DeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. In re the Inquiry Concerning McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. In the Matter of Douglas A. KRULL, Judicial MagistrateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. In Re the Inquiry Concerning GerardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API