Legal Opinion
Stanford v. Union Labor Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall E. Livingston, J.
These motions for summary judgment will be considered as listed below.
*782Motion A in Action No. 1 is by the Union Labor Life Insuranee Company (Union) for summary judgment on the first cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint.
Motion B in Action No. 1 is by defendant John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (Hancock) for summary judgment in the third cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint.
Motion C in Action No. 1 is by defendant Dorothy Colbert Stanford (Dorothy) for summary judgment on the second cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint.
Motion D in Action No. 2 is by plaintiff for summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Katzman v. Ætna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Morgan v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Regan v. National Postal Transport Ass'nCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- Jackman v. JackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Snell v. SnellNew York Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of AveryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981
- Christensen v. SabadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Sessa v. Trustees of Mortuary Fund of Local No. 1Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
- Jayson v. JaysonNew York Supreme Court · 1975