Legal Opinion
Salamanca Trust Co. v. McHugh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff bank commenced an action against Drs. McHugh and Gothgen to recover sums allegedly due on a series of demand notes. The bank also sued Dr. McHugh’s wife for an alleged misrepresentation made on a financial statement concerning ownership interests in certain property. Prior to service of the summons and complaint, plaintiff applied for an order attaching property owned by the McHughs. That application was orally granted, but no order was signed or entered, and no property was attached. To deter further steps toward…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. WaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lincoln First Bank v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Lyons v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Cultural Center Commission v. KokoritsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. IAG International Acceptance Group N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Long v. LongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Winklevoss Capital Fund, LLC v. ShremDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- A & M Exports, Ltd. v. Meridien International Bank, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Benzemann v. Citibank N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017