Legal Opinion

People v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*987—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Because he was absent from the Sandoval hearing, defendant was deprived of his right to be present at all material stages of the proceedings against him (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656, 662; People v Hall, 201 AD2d 891). Contrary to the People’s contention, defendant’s presence at the Sandoval hearing would not have been superfluous (see, People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872; People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Petit Larceny.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Law-ton, Doerr…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. OdiatNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RussinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API