Legal Opinion

Healey's Case

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 12, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

On the ninth day of September in 1918, Eva M. Healey, an employee of the Dingley-Foss Shoe Company, sustained personal injuries while working in her employment, the cause being that a fellow employee snatched the chair in which she was seated, whereby she dropped to and forcibly upon the floor.

An “open-end” agreement, that is, an agreement between Miss Healey and her employer, concerning the paying of compensation from a given time for an indefinite period, was approved by the Labor Commissioner, and in consequence became of the same effect as the judgment of a court. R. S., Chap. 50, Sec.…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Dufault v. Midland-Ross of Canada, Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  3. Soucy v. Fraser Paper, LimitedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. Canning v. State Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. Bernier v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API