Legal Opinion

Dryden Hotel Associates v. Grimbilas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about August 8, 1994, which, in Action No. 1, granted *164defendant’s motion for leave to amend the answer to include a counterclaim for an accounting, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Judgment, same court and Justice, entered September 21, 1994, which, in Action No. 2, granted defendant Dryden Hotel Associates’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Leave to amend the answer was properly granted (see, Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934), any prejudice claimed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hotel Prince George Affiliates v. MaroulisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Maroulis v. 64th Street-Third Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Livadiotakis v. TzitzikalakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API