Legal Opinion

Steen v. Colombo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1987No. 14757PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Presiding Judge.

Defendants, Mario and Elizabeth Colombo, appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Camden County ordering them to deed real estate they owned to plaintiffs, Thomas D. and Loretta F. Steen, and ordering the Steens to pay the Colombos $32,000 for the property.

The judgment was premised on the alleged right of the trial court to order the forced sale of the real estate, by reason of the provisions of § 524.160, et seq.,1 which statutes constitute the so-called “betterment act.” The act is contained in chapter 524, titled “Ejectment,” and is designed to prevent unjust…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tice v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Stump v. HornbackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Toalson v. MadisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Shaul v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steen v. ColomboMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Lee v. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Steen v. ColomboMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Steen v. ColomboMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API