Legal Opinion
Bielstein v. Hawkins
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1951No. 3332PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOTTINGER, Judge.
Plaintiff, Joe A. Bielstein, instituted this suit against defendant, J. C. Hawkins, to recover wages, legal penalties and attorney fees under the provisions of Act No. ISO of 1920, as amended by Act No. 138 of 1936, Dart Statutes, Sections 4360 and 4361, L.S. A.-R.S. 23:631, 23:632. He claims wages in the amount of $101.68, plus penalties amounting to $89.60 per calendar- week from the 15th day -of March, 1949, until paid, as provided in said Acts, with legal interest from date of judicial demand, plus reasonable attorney fees, and costs.
Defendant answered and specifically…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bannon v. Techeland Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Oller v. BenderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Whitehead v. E. J. Deas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Binnion v. M. D. DrugsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stell v. CaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hays v. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Com'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Otwell v. Howard Lumber & Supply Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Strickland v. American Pitch Pine Export Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Porter v. LombardinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.