Legal Opinion

Seidman & Seidman v. Schwartz

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 25, 1984No. 04-82-00480-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESQUIVEL, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal from a plea of privilege hearing. Plaintiff/counter-defendant Seidman & Seidman (S & S), a national accounting partnership with a regional office in Houston, sued Sol Schwartz (Schwartz), a partner in S & S’s San Antonio office, in Bexar County, alleging that Schwartz breached his fiduciary duty to the partnership by orchestrating a wholesale walkout of S & S employees, and the initiation of a new accounting firm utilizing said employees. The petition also alleged that Schwartz purloined trade secrets, destroyed S & S’s goodwill, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Seaman v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Carter v. William Sommerville and Son, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. James v. DryeTexas Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Clary Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API