Legal Opinion

Stephanie Hartmann and Eva Hartmann v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Debra Hartmann, and Harvey Loochtan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 9, 1993No. 92-3664Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 F.3d 1207

Stephanie HARTMANN and Eva Hartmann, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Debra Hartmann, and

Harvey Loochtan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-3664.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Sept. 21, 1993.

Decided Nov. 9, 1993.

Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc

Denied Dec. 9, 1993.

Jonathan B. Gilbert (argued), David P. Schippers, Schippers & Gilbert, Chicago, IL, for Stephanie Hartmann and Eva H. Vinson.

Joseph J. Hasman, Steven P. Mandell (argued), Sherri L. Giffin, Peterson & Ross, Chicago, IL, for Prudential Ins. Co. of America.

Jeffrey B. Steinbeck,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API