Legal Opinion

People v. Strong

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided March 17, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Strong, C. M.

It is sufficiently clear, as a matter of law, that, unless protected by the clause added in 1929 to subdivision 3 of section 899 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (L. 1929, ch. 344), answers of the prophetic type given by this defendant to the policewomen’s questions must be deemed to constitute fortunetelling. The word “ pretend ’•’ in the statute simply means that the Legislature was skeptical of anyone’s ability to foretell future events and used the word in the sense of “ make claim ”. In other words, the person charged with the offense may believe in his or her ability to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RosenbergNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API