Legal Opinion

Babinsack v. Alfonso-Garcia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 2016No. A16A1071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFadden, Judge.

Aline Babinsack appeals from a stalking protective order entered against her. Initially, we hold that Babinsack was entitled to file a direct appeal from the order, even though the case remains pending below. As for the merits of the appeal, Babinsack argues that the trial court erred by entering the order because any stalking had ended a year before, but stalking protective orders may be entered to prevent future conduct. Babinsack also argues that the evidence does not support the order, but without a transcript of all the evidence presented to the court, we are bound to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Titelman v. StedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Crane v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. State v. SinghSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. Sinclair v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Thornton v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erika Birg v. Emory UniversityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
  2. Kamal Makhmudov v. Lucas W. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  3. Michael E. Sullivan, Jr. v. Sherry M. KubanyiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API