Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Weiss

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

Section 1168 of the Civil Practice Act permits the defendant in a separation action to counterclaim for divorce. (See Rolle v. Rolle, 201 App. Div. 698.) The fact that the adultery relied on did not occur until after the commencement of the action should not alter the situation and make it necessary for the defendant to commence a separate action. In Otto v. Otto (220 App. Div. 130) a plaintiff was permitted to ■ serve a *265supplemental complaint setting up acts of adultery on the part of the defendant which occurred after the origina) complaint was served, the court saying (at p. 132): “No good…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blanc v. BlancNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Rolle v. RolleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Otto v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Ames v. AmesNew York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API