Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re K.C.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2017No. NOS. C–170340; C–170379Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, J.

{¶ 17} Does a child have a legal interest in with whom she lives? Can a teenager argue that the juvenile court erred by placing, or not placing, her with an aunt who had petitioned for custody of her? The majority says no. I cannot approve a result that deprives the right to appeal from children whose familial attachment and life direction are being drastically altered. Today's decision isn't about whether the placement of the children with the county is correct. It is about silencing the children on appeal. I therefore dissent in part.

{¶ 18} The majority relies on one case in reaching its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re Z.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API