Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. County of Gosper
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
In this action plaintiff sought to recover taxes paid under protest. The basis of the suit is that the taxes were levied in excess of the constitutional limitation of Article VIII, section 5. An answer and a reply were filed. Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court denied the motion and dismissed plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause.
Article VIII, section 5, of our Constitution provides: “County authorities shall never assess taxes the aggregate of which shall exceed fifty cents per one hundred dollars actual valuation as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Roche v. Cairo & Thebes RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Chase County v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Grand Island & Wyoming Central Railroad v. County of DawesNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KleinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- People Ex Rel. Hileman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.