Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Beardsley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Wake ley, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

The facts in the above case are substantially as follows:

Wilson & Larison, the plaintiffs in error, were, at the time referred to herein, and are now, importers and jobbers of teas, cigars, and spices, having- their principal place of business at Omaha, Nebraska. During the times aforesaid they had in their employ a traveling salesman named A. P. Nichols. Under their contract of hire with him they were to pay him a salary of $75 per month, and commismissions upon all sales, and he was .-to pay his own expenses. On the 5th of January, 1883, Wilson & Larison wrote a letter to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Bronson's v. ChappellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Golding v. Merchant & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1869
  4. Tucker v. WoolseyNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Howell, Jewett & Co. v. Graff, Murray & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lachmiller v. Lachmiller Engineering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Walker v. PeakeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API