Grotenkemper v. Achtermeyer & Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 3 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM KENTON CHANCERY COURT. CITED Benjamin on Sales, 35-37, 378-80. Story on Agency, section 27. Revised Statutes, Myers’s Supp., p. 300, sec. 1. 2 Kent, page 537. 3 Term Rep. 148, Paine v. Cave. 1 Parsons on Contracts, p. 418, note e. 4 Bing. 653, Routledge v. Grant. 1 Bouv.
Read the full summary
Case 3 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM KENTON CHANCERY COURT. CITED Benjamin on Sales, 35-37, 378-80. Story on Agency, section 27. Revised Statutes, Myers’s Supp., p. 300, sec. 1. 2 Kent, page 537. 3 Term Rep. 148, Paine v. Cave. 1 Parsons on Contracts, p. 418, note e. 4 Bing. 653, Routledge v. Grant. 1 Bouv. Law Die., “Auction,” “ Bidder.” 3 Bush, 621, Thomas v. Kerr. 7 111. 614, Burke v. Haley. 6 Leigh, 16, Brent v. Green. 1 Met. 575, Smith v. N. Bank Ky. 5 Bush, 304, Gere v. Cushing, &c. 2 Swan, 316, Barnes v. Thompson. 2 Sneed, 268, E. T. Iron M. Co. v. Bynum. 53 Maine, 394, Horton v.…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Peters
Various creditors of Achtermeyer & Co. having sued them severally, and having obtained attachments, all of which were levied on the property, real and personal, of Achtermeyer and Brinckman, who composed the firm of Achtermeyer & Co., all of said suits were in due time consolidated and prepared to be heard together.
Afterward such proceedings were had in the consolidated cases that a judgment was rendered for a sale of the real and personal estate of the said firm and the master directed to execute the judgment; and on the. 13th of June, 1873, he filed his report of sale, in which, among other…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Salyers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Freeman v. PooleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1915
- Head v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Kraft v. OtmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.