People v. Cardova
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the showup identification procedure was unduly suggestive is without merit (see People v *1009Amico, 78 AD3d 1190 [2010]; People v Parris, 70 AD3d 725 [2010]; People v Gonzalez, 61 AD3d 775 [2009]; People v Guy, 47 AD3d 643 [2008]; People v Cruz, 31 AD3d 660 [2006]; People v Rodgers, 6 AD3d 464, 465 [2004]).
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant either failed to object to the comments or made only general objections, and did not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. LeonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. OcchioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cardova v. LavalleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CardovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.