Legal Opinion

Raiford v. United States

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 30, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01089Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT EARL RAIFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:20-cv-01089-RDP-JHE ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Robert Earl Raiford, a federal inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Talladega, Alabama, (“FCI Talladega”) filed this pro se action pursuant the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). (Doc. 1). He names the United States of America as Defendant, claiming that since May 2019, Defendant has provided negligent medical care for his damaged lungs, liver, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. BRADFORD, THROUGH BRADFORDSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Tuck v. HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY OF HUNTSVILLESupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API